![A sign outside of a polling location guides voters inside.](https://www.gpb.org/sites/default/files/styles/flexheight/public/2020-09/earlyvotingtexas_20057667152186.jpg?itok=Lc3wqz8F)
Section Branding
Header Content
Political Rewind: A Fiery, Feisty First Presidential Debate
Primary Content
![A sign outside of a polling location guides voters inside.](https://www.gpb.org/sites/default/files/styles/flexheight/public/2020-09/earlyvotingtexas_20057667152186.jpg?itok=Lc3wqz8F)
Wednesday on Political Rewind: The first presidential debate featured a fiery, raucous back-and-forth that some critics say lacked substantial discussion on policy issues. Where do we stand now following the first matchup of the candidates?
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Tia Mitchell said the chaos was partly to blame on the debate's format.
"I think the moderator failed to anticipate how bad it would get," she said. "So Chris Wallace did not have any other options but to talk over them, and that didn't work."
Also: the latest developments in the slate of consequential Georgia elections.
Panelists:
Alan Abramowitz — Professor of Political Science, Emory University
Greg Bluestein — Politics Reporter, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Andra Gillespie — Professor of Political Science, Emory University
Tia Mitchell — Washington Correspondent, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Secondary Content
Bottom Content
![GPB](/sites/default/files/styles/three_two_702x468/public/2020-06/gpb.jpg?h=f5007b8c&itok=I2YtKsVu)